Council passes occupation tax

By Joelyn Hansen/Daily Sun staff writer
Tuesday, Oct 21, 2008 - 09:50:02 am CDT

The Beatrice City Council approved the third and final reading of a 3 percent occupation tax, projected to generate $60,000 a year, on all Beatrice lodging facilities to begin Dec. 1.

The money will be placed in the general fund for city capital improvement projects, such as the Beatrice trail system or the Carnegie Library.

The proposed tax ordinance was presented and read twice at the city council meeting in July. At that time the proposed tax drew opposition from local hotel and motel owners. Local hotel and motel owners were concerned the tax would decrease business because of the added expense to patrons.

Over the last few months, the occupation tax committee, made of councilmen Phil Cook, Ted Fairbanks, Rich Kerr and Gary Lytle; met with members of the lodging industry to discuss their concerns. The committee and the representatives from the lodging industry agreed that if the tax would pass there would be continual updates on how much the tax was garnering and a portion collected would go toward increasing tourism in Beatrice.  

Kerr expressed his concerns about initiating another tax.

“I still think this is just another tax we’re putting on,” he said. “I just hope that if we do initiate this thing there will be records kept with how much is actually in the general fun for this and this will be used not for the bells and whistles and toys that we want to spend it on.

“But, use it when we have to keep from having to tax, or put extra burden on our taxpayers.”

Councilman Alan Fetty agreed with Kerr that the funds need to be used for special projects where the money is not available in the general budget.

“We as a council talk continuously about broadening our tax base,” Fetty said. “I think this is a way to do it.”

Lori Warner, president of the Beatrice Area Chamber of Commerce, asked the council to continue to keep in mind the importance of promoting tourism in Beatrice to put “heads on beds”.

“We have to find a way to promote and get people to stay here more than six hours or eight hours,” Warner said. “We want them to stay overnight.”

The city previously enacted a 2.5 percent occupation tax in 2007 to help pay for a proposed joint city and county visitors center, but the tax was repealed after Gage County dropped out of the project.

In other business:

Grant Street: Approved change order increase of $4,350 and final payment in the amount of $69,813 to Trauernicht Construction Inc. for the Grant Street reconstruction project.

Wheel loader: Approved lease program for a 2008 Wheel Loader 924HZ Caterpillar as recommended by the Board of Public Works.

Cedar Street closing: Approved resolution to close Cedar Street between Scott and West Mary streets on the days when school is in session between 2:50 p.m. and 3:30 p.m.

Milliken Street: Approved rezoning properties, 605 Milliken, 603 Milliken, 601 Milliken and 715 Milliken, Riverside Park Addition, from Residential commercial to general; commercial.

Northgate: Approved application of Northgate Investment Co., LLC, for rezoning three parcels located in the northeast quarter of the southwest corner of U.S. Highway 77 and Hickory Road parcel #1 from agricultural to general commercial, parcel #2 from agricultural to office and parcel #3 from agricultural to general commercial.

Northgate Crossing: Approved final reading to annex the parcel known as Northgate Crossing , Section16, Township 4 north, range 6 east of the 6th pm, located north of the Beatrice Airport.

911 Ambulance: Approved to send the two bids, ranging from $164,000 to $167,500, received for a new 911 ambulance for review by the city administrator and the Beatrice Fire and Rescue Chief.

LB840 funds: The council was presented the semi-annual report of the Citizen’s Advisory Review Committee concerning LB840 funding. The city currently has $901,586 in LB840 funding to be used toward economic development. The past year’s revenue brought in an additional $406,424. The only expenditure for the year was $180,000 to Gage County Economic Development.

Leave a Comment

All posts are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.

Log in to submit comment or Create New Account below

*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
*Zip Code:
By submitting this form you agree with our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Please check this box to confirm:
 
Bells and Whistles
Oct 21, 2008 12:49 PM
I've recently been told by a city councilman that the Mayor is putting GPS tracking devices in the BPW, police, and fire cars and trucks. Is that to babysit the adults who have been doing a great job for years, or just "Bells and whistles".

Seems like a waste of my tax paying dollars!

As said by a councilman:

“I still think this is just another tax we’re putting on,” he said. “I just hope that if we do initiate this thing there will be records kept with how much is actually in the general fun for this and this will be used not for the bells and whistles and toys that we want to spend it on.

“But, use it when we have to keep from having to tax, or put extra burden on our taxpayers.”
LB840
Oct 21, 2008 4:17 PM
And how's that GCED investment working out??
Explain yourselves
Oct 21, 2008 4:59 PM
Now I see why we canceled out! the only expenditure was 180,000 for what? NOTHING! We have almost a million bucks for job and tax producing businesses, not that white elephant Ethanol plant!!
Lodger
Oct 21, 2008 10:23 PM
We'll see the occupancy rate in all the lodging facilities here drop after Dec. 1st. There's nothing to do here to fill all the rooms. They would have to offer free breakfast buffets, not just a free continental breakfast. Since there's no buffet's here of any kind (besides Chinese) town folk would line up to eat free food, chit chat just like at the estate auctions.
MiMi
Oct 22, 2008 3:04 PM
This is NOT another tax for residents. This is a tax for hotels/motels occupancy. It is then dedicated to be spent on tourism to promote the area. I can't understand why the hotel/motels would object as the money has to be used for tourism which would bring people to town to stay in the hotel/motels. As a former auditor, I can tell you that the tax program is audited. The motel/hotel records are audited to assure they are turning the occupancy tax into the city and then the city is audited to make sure they spent it on tourism.
umm
Oct 23, 2008 12:23 PM
the hotels would disapprove because anyone searching to have a convention or the like compares costs. If savings is substantial they may have it here rther than Lincoln, but if it's the same cost either way most people attending will prefer to stay in Lincoln where they have access to better restaurants, shopping, and the like rather than the fast food and wally world in this town. Also for people travelling if you can make staying here cost significantlyless people will stay here rather than Lincoln, but if you use taxes to make the rates the same than they may as well stay in Lincoln where again they have more hotel options and more other stuff to do. Most of these folks are NOT a captive audience that you can tax all you like and they will still be there, strangely enough they do have other choices and they tend to explore them before choosing where to stay or hold a convention.
Right MiMi
Oct 23, 2008 7:48 PM
It's just that, a tax for hotels/motels occupancy. It's not the locals that will have to pay it, it's the ones STAYING here. That's the downfall, since there's nothing to do HERE.
Joe
Oct 24, 2008 12:33 AM
Too bad Beatrice is instituting this kind of tax. I guess I'll have to stay at another locale when I visit. Beatrice is just not that interesting, to add more money to the local lodging. No problem though, there are other surrounding communities where a lodging tax is worth it. I can just drive into Beatrice from other places.
MiMi
Oct 24, 2008 12:59 PM
The majority of towns and cities already have this tax. When was the last time you changed your destination plans for $3.00 (mol)? Lancaster is 4%.
Here is the link to see what all the counties in Nebraska are doing.

http://industry.visitnebraska.org/pdfs/industry/information/2007lodgingtax.pdf
Mimi
Oct 25, 2008 1:27 PM
you have to think larger than one room for one night. What about folks looking at coming in for a week or so on business, or looking at multiple rooms for conventions. Not too long ago I attended a conference in Tecumseh where they booked the entire Super 8 for five nights. Think people lining up stuff like that don't take these "little" costs into consideration?
hmmmm
Oct 27, 2008 2:50 PM
I wish they would put some of that tax money back into the baseball & softball fields. The ball tournaments are about the only time those hotels are full.
Story Photo
Text Size:
Text Size Increase Text Size Decrease
Print Story Email Story
AP Video: Breaking News

All Videos

Calendar of Events

February 2010
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28
Today's Events

Sign up for email alerts