County attorney will ask board to reconsider grant proposal

By Catharine Huddle/Daily Sun staff
Saturday, Aug 23, 2008 - 12:59:57 pm CDT

Gage County Attorney Randy Ritnour has asked the County Board of Supervisors to consider an amended grant to add an attorney to his office to prosecute alcohol-related offenses.

Ritnour asked that the item be placed on the board’s Wednesday agenda.

The request marks another chapter in an increasingly public dispute between the county supervisors and the county attorney.

On July 30, the board voted to reject a $44,000 federal grant to the county attorney’s office, saying that accepting the money through the Nebraska Office of Highway Safety would cost the county too much in the long run. At that meeting, supervisors voted 5-2 to oppose using federal highway safety assistance or other funding for additional positions at the county attorney’s office, saying that adding the new position would cost $43,000 for the first year, as much as $54,000 for the second and $67,000 for the third.

Ritnour said at the time that the cost to the county for the additional attorney, including benefits, would be $7,000 to $9,000. And, he said, an in-kind contribution from the Gage County Multiple Agencies Partnering for Success coalition would kick in $2,500.

Earlier this month, Ritnour applied for and got an amended grant for $96,370 for the fiscal year beginning Oct. 1, with the option of reapplying for two additional years of funding after that.

“We are unable to officially commit funding beyond the initial fiscal year,” Office of Highway Safety Administrator Fred E. Zwonechek said in an Aug. 7 letter to Ritnour. “However, as long as the grant is successfully meeting its goals and objectives, we would approve funding for two additional years without any hard matching requirements as long as federal funds are available.”

Ritnour said Friday that that means the second and third years of the grant, if approved, would be fully funded.

“Your guess is as good as mine,” he said when asked if he thinks the board will vote to accept the money. “I hope that they’ll see that it’s a 100 percent grant and that ... if we’re successful, they’re very much willing to look at no hard-match funding for the next two years.”

Board Chairman Rex Adams said he couldn’t handicap how the board will vote either.

“I can’t speak for the others,” Adams said Friday afternoon. “I guess I feel if he spent as much time doing his job as he does fighting against us right now he’d probably be more effective.”

Last month, the county attorney and the county board traded accusations of grandstanding and bending or breaking state law regarding timely publication of the board’s agenda.

“I’m about done saying anything on it, really,” Adams said. “It’s time to go on.

“You know, every year the sheriff applies for two cars and two more deputies. We tell him no and it’s over. ... For the betterment of the community, you go on. You roll up your sleeves, and if you have to work harder, you work harder.”

Ritnour says accepting the grant and cracking down on alcohol-related accidents and fatalities is for the betterment of the community.

“This issue results in people dying,” he said. “Our alcohol-related traffic deaths and accidents are up there compared to other counties. ... What we’re hoping to do here is, at least as far as this issue is concerned, is work ourselves out of a job. If we get four years down the line and we haven’t been able to address this issue I’m going to be very surprised. This is not some subterfuge to try to build some little empire.

“Obviously ... there may be some basis or some reason that you want to keep the attorney. On the other hand, hopefully what we’ve done is addressed the DUI issue so that people know, at least in Gage County, you don’t want to be doing this, and we’re back down on the lower end of fatalities and injuries.”

Ritnour said he hopes to keep the discussion over accepting the grant open and civil.

“Literally, you’re talking about maybe $300,000 to $400,000 over the next few years. I don’t know how you can turn that down.”

Adams said it appears Ritnour’s office is handling its caseload just fine. It’s the board’s job, Adams said, to keep a lid on spending.

“My territory and turf is different than his,” he said. “Mine is the budget and making sure we live within the means that we can.”

Two weeks after the board rejected the initial grant offer, it voted to contract with an outside law firm for its civil work, saying that would give the county attorney’s office more time to pursue such things as drunk driving. The board also said it will ask for a state attorney general’s opinion on whether county officials are required to live in the county in which they were elected. Adams said then that questions have been raised about Ritnour’s residency.

Ritnour said the attorney general’s office already told him his living arrangement -- he said he has an apartment in Beatrice and lives part of time with his wife in Lincoln -- is acceptable.

Leave a Comment

All posts are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.

Log in to submit comment or Create New Account below

*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
*Zip Code:
By submitting this form you agree with our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Please check this box to confirm:
 
Anya
Aug 23, 2008 1:21 PM
Good luck to Mr. Ritnour. I doubt the board will accept it. They seem pretty committed to protecting drunk drivers.
move on
Aug 23, 2008 3:20 PM
this is already old news. they will deny the grant as they should. ain't their better news than this?
A Ha
Aug 23, 2008 3:27 PM
Ritnour now says he will keep the extra attorney after the grant. He kept saying all along he wouldn't. That man does not tell the truth. Now we know he used MADD for his own gain. This guy is something else. The board should deny this forever. Also, shouldn't the county attorney of all people at the minimum be truthful. He prosecutes those who are not all the time. sad sad sad.
All Board members
Aug 23, 2008 3:31 PM
I hope the safety of the kids in this county will override all your egos against Ritnour. Vote YES for the sake of our young people.
SJB
Aug 23, 2008 6:41 PM
I hope eventually Gage County will realize how fortunate they are to have a County Attorney like Randy Ritnour.

I moved away from Beatrice quite a few years age. When I worked in a Lincoln law firm, and met Randy through the office. He is extremely fair and never show any favoritism.

From reading the online Daily Sun, it would appear that his request is justified with the large increase in crime, DUI, etc.
pck
Aug 25, 2008 12:11 PM
let the man do his job....He does more than the board could ever think of....intelligently anyway
Stay strong
Aug 25, 2008 1:07 PM
I hope Ritnour stays strong with this project. I too believe that the Gage County area has turned their heads to the drinking problems in this community. Especially the minors and even more so people with CDL's.
Beatrice Resident for years
Aug 25, 2008 1:52 PM
What excuse will the county board come up with now to deny it...? They can no longer hide behind the costs involved, since NOHS has taken that issue off the table. So, will they actually come right out and say they are denying it because (1) their egos are too big, (2) their negativity toward Randy and his office permeates everything they do, or (3) they simply don't care about the health and safety of our community so they'd rather see drunks go unprosecuted than keep ME and my family safe...? Hmmm, which is it going to be...? Take your pick, board -- thing is, whichever reason you choose, it boils down to the fact that if you vote against this grant yet again, you are an irresponsible board with no one to blame for the condition of our counties. Rex Adams' quite says it all - you only see yourselves as the fisical oversight body for Gage County and have taken absolutely NO responsibilty for the other, more serious issues facing our counties - our safety and health, to name a few.
wondering
Aug 25, 2008 2:49 PM
Has Ritnour said how he's going to recruit an attorney for a position that may only be existence for one or maybe two years?
truth teller
Aug 25, 2008 6:42 PM
Please read every article in each newspaper that had a story about this. The dailey sun, journal star, voice, and world herald. write down each comment by ritnour. he now says different things than he did before. county attorneys should be at the minimum truthful. by his own words it appears he says whatever is necessary. also he shifts the topic to others. it's in his words!
no wonder
Aug 25, 2008 6:47 PM
to wondering- he knows he wants to keep him permantly. now he even says so, kinda.
Friend in a Neighboring County
Aug 25, 2008 8:43 PM
Mr. Adams suggested that Mr. Ritnour focus on his job more and less on fighting with the board. That way he would be "more effective". But, then later stated that Mr. Ritnour is doing his job "just fine".

Is he effective, or isn't he? I would suggest that he is VERY effective, but he wants to be even MORE effective at his job by prosecuting more DUI/s - something which Gage county has more than its fair share of, apparently. And that is something he simply cannot do with only two deputy attorneys.
have an answer
Aug 26, 2008 8:59 AM
to friend, are you saying ritnour has not been prosecuting the people charged with dui? how can he be more effective if he is already prosecuting the ones charged by the sheriff and city police? county attorneys can only do what is given to them by the real law enforcement people
Just wondering
Aug 26, 2008 10:16 AM
Friend in a Neighboring County - you are probably north, west, or south of us as most east of us are glad to be rid of Mr. Ritnour!

I too wonder what Mr. Ritnour is neglecting to prosecute the alcohol offenses (I've not heard of a single time where he let go of an alcohol offense so something else must be being let go?). If he isn't neglecting anything and everything is getting done, then it's just a matter of we don't want to work so hard???
cheyenne
Aug 26, 2008 7:22 PM
Here we go again!!! Come on board...get off your EGOS and do what is right!!!What will your excuse be this time if you deny this grant???
what in the world
Aug 26, 2008 8:44 PM
if ritnour is so overworked how does he have time to work a part time job? he is on the roster as an instructor in the criminal justice classes at the southeast community college in lincoln and has been i believe since the first part of the year and is listed until the end of december. for $72,000.00 per year plus benifits would you think he could maybe put a few more hours in for the ole taxpayers? This just doesn't add up. with the class start time he would need to leave work early, when does he prepare for class, etc.? the county board is right on the money. you know he gets paid for this also. can the board lower his salary? sheesh!
Friend
Aug 26, 2008 9:10 PM
Dear Have an Answer: Good point. I should have said, "prosecuting to the fullest extent of the law", and included all alcohol-related offenses, not just DUI/s.

Hope that makes more sense.

Dear Just Wondering: Not east. Also, prosecutors have to let things go, don't they; it's the nature of the business of enforcing the law. It is called prosecutorial discretion and it is a very broad power. I think the reason for giving them this power is simply that prosecutors (and cops) are always vastly outnumbered by people who commit crimes.

Law enforcemeent is like a cork in a dam, really.

I think what Mr. Ritnour wants is simply to install one more attorney in his office so he can - I'll say it again - prosecute more crimes to the fullest extent of the law. In other words, do his job better.
move on
Aug 27, 2008 3:00 PM
the silent majority is aginst adding another attorney. ritnour needs to move on. he lost, twice, its time for adult behaviour.
To the Public
Aug 29, 2008 5:25 AM
All of those out there complaing about Ritnour having an other job, what about Rex Adams being on the railroad fulltime? He's an elected official too.
to to the public
Aug 29, 2008 2:27 PM
A commissioner job doesn't pay like a full time job, these are people that do this IN ADDITION TO whatever pays their bills. The county attorney on the other hand is paid quite well with the understanding that is their primary duty.
To to to the public
Aug 29, 2008 4:37 PM
County commissioners make close to $20,000 a year plus paid health insurance. For many people in this community, that is a full time salary! Don't make it sound like their volunteering their time or making very little. Personally, how fortunate we are to have a county attorney who also teaches. I'm sure the University utilizes many professionals as adjunct faculty who are also paid very well in their fields. I don't recall Ritnour ever asking for another atty because his "personal life" was/is to busy. Yet, the board can put in a position to help them manage their affairs? At how much money to the tax payers? Look, you might have an arguable point if Ritnour was not doing his job, but he is. Ritnours teaching has nothing to do with getting or not getting this grant. The board has rationalized that they are protecting tax payer $$$ - most of us should be grateful to them because it won't affect us finacially - some of us will only have to pay out of pocket expenses for such things as medical, insurance deduct. and attorney fee's because of drunks on the roads. But hey, on the bright side - that will keep the economy strong - you know - help pay for the new hospital, new car sales and maybe a few headstones. Again - your missing the point - teaching has nothing to do with it. MMP
Joe
Aug 29, 2008 9:43 PM
Nebraska county attorneys are prohibited from practicing law if their counties are a certain population, e.g., Gage county. If they are ambitious enough, those county attorneys are free to pursue other occupations, however. Teaching a class is not practicing law.

Not everyone sits in front of the television sipping a cold one after work. Mr. Ritnour apparently enjoys the law enough to not only practice it, but also to teach it to young men and women in his "off-hours".

Good for him!
Story Photo
Text Size:
Text Size Increase Text Size Decrease
Print Story Email Story

Calendar of Events

November 2008
S M T W T F S
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30
Today's Events