Woman in prison for ‘85 murder recants

By Joe Duggan/Lee Enterprises
Friday, Aug 08, 2008 - 09:45:35 am CDT

OMAHA -- The last time Ada JoAnn Taylor spoke publicly about the 1985 killing, she helped convict a man of first-degree murder.

Now, she’s hoping her words will help set him free.

In 1989, Taylor was a 26-year-old dairy worker from North Carolina who told a jury she watched two men rape Helen Wilson on a winter night four years earlier.

She told how she and five other drug users broke into the Beatrice widow’s apartment.

She said she watched Joseph White and Thomas Winslow take turns sexually assaulting the 68-year-old.

And she admitted she held a pillow over Wilson’s face.

“I didn’t want her to see the face that would haunt her,” Taylor testified.

“Why would the face haunt her?” the prosecutor asked.

“I know from previous experience that when you’re raped, the face can haunt you.”

Last week, attorneys representing White and Winslow said DNA tests have cleared them of the rape. They have asked that their cases be reconsidered and are waiting for a judge to decide whether to throw out their convictions.

If they are exonerated, they will be the first Nebraska prison inmates freed by DNA testing.

But the case is complicated, and the outcome remains unclear.

Before it’s decided, Taylor might have to take the witness stand again.

Last time, she said, she lied. This time, she said, she’ll tell the truth.

“I hope they understand I was a young mom, I was dumb and I did what I had to do to save my life,” Taylor told the Journal Star Tuesday, the first time she discussed the case publicly since 1989.

She was never in Helen Wilson’s apartment, she said during an interview at the minimum-security Omaha Community Corrections Center. Nor did she see White and Winslow rape Wilson.

The story about the pillow -- not a shred of truth, she said.

Taylor said she lied because investigators and the prosecutor claimed they had evidence to prove her guilt. They forced her to make an agonizing choice -- testify against the others and serve seven years in prison, or roll the dice at trial and face a possible life term.

Former Gage County Attorney Richard Smith prosecuted the case. Smith, now a private attorney in Beatrice, said Thursday he did not want to jeopardize new legal proceedings by discussing the 1989 trial.

But he scoffed at Taylor’s claim authorities fed her details so she could help them get convictions.

“The plea agreement was that she had to testify truthfully,” Smith said.

Taylor pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and has spent the past 18 years in prison. She has a year left before her mandatory release.

Some facts about the case are not in dispute, namely that Wilson was severely beaten, bound, raped and suffocated on Feb. 5 or 6, 1985. No arrests were made until 1989, after an investigator obtained new information from a confidential informant, according to stories published that year in the Journal Star.

An investigator then interviewed Winslow, who was being held on an unrelated assault charge, and got more information.

Arrests followed. So did interrogations. And not long after, some of the defendants began cutting deals.

Of the six people arrested in the case, Winslow and White were the only two who didn’t testify for the prosecution.

White maintained his innocence, was convicted by jury of first-degree murder and was sentenced to life in prison.

DNA testing wasn’t an option at the original trial. Investigators did find three fingerprints, but they didn’t match the suspects, the victim or her family.

On the other hand, they found blood with “great similarities” to one of the suspects, who apparently was hit unintentionally by White.

Winslow said he didn’t remember participating in the crime. But after seeing the result of White’s trial, he pleaded no contest to aiding and abetting second-degree murder and was sentenced to 50 years in prison. He remains incarcerated today.

Following her arrest, Taylor said she endured long sessions of questioning by authorities. At a point she can’t remember, she requested an attorney and was assigned one by the court.

Investigators told her they could prove she participated in the crime, she said. They told her they knew White and Winslow did the rape while she held the pillow that suffocated the victim.

“I knew I wasn’t guilty, but you get tired of being told things that after so long, you just started accepting it,” she said this week.

She said Smith, the county attorney, participated in the interrogations and urged her to take the plea agreement, saying he would recommend a 15-year sentence. With good time, she could be free in seven years.

Her court-appointed lawyer said he thought he could win her acquittal, but he also advised that 15 years in prison for second-degree murder was a good deal, Taylor said.

Finally, she said, she agreed to the plea bargain after Smith offered it a fourth time.

“I was coerced. I should have never went with what the investigators or the county attorney wanted said. I should have fought it. I hate the fact that I didn’t fight it.”

She knows some people won’t believe her when she says she’s telling the truth now.

Burdette Searcey of Beatrice would likely fall into that category.

In 1989, when he was with the Gage County Sheriff’s Department, he revived the investigation into the Wilson murder.

Searcey declined to comment when told about Taylor recanting her testimony, except to say, “the evidence will prove out as it did before.”

Smith, the former county attorney, said he spoke with Taylor before she pleaded guilty, but only when her attorney was in the room. He also opted not to debate the facts of the case.

“I never tried cases in the press and I’m not going to start doing that now,” he said.

Attorneys for White and Winslow interviewed Taylor as they worked to get court-ordered DNA testing for their clients. She told them she gave false trial testimony before DNA tests proved the men were not the rapists, said Jerry Soucie, an attorney with the Nebraska Commission on Public Advocacy.

When asked to describe her testimony of 19 years ago, Taylor said she couldn’t remember details. Nor could she offer an alibi for her whereabouts on the night of Feb. 5, 1985.

At that time in her life, she said, she spent her days drunk on Jack Daniel’s and her nights high on cocaine, she said. She was a violent drunk, she admitted, getting into frequent bar fights. But she insisted she would have remembered if she participated in a murder.

Taylor said she quit drugs and alcohol after leaving Nebraska for North Carolina in 1985. She has earned a GED and completed courses at Metropolitan Community College in Omaha, and she plans to take classes at Bellevue University, she said. She attends church every Sunday, she said, and she has developed a relationship with a daughter she lost because of her addictions.

She wants to help the men she lied about, she said. It’s not about reducing her sentence, since she’s almost completed it.

If anything, recanting her testimony puts her at risk of a perjury charge, although she doesn’t think that will happen.

She would like to clear her name, she said. She wants to work with troubled children.

She said she feels badly for the family of Helen Wilson if she’s robbing them of emotional closure. Yet she feels even worse that her testimony helped put White and Winslow in prison.

She hopes they win their freedom soon.

“I didn’t think it through (in 1989),” she said. “I didn’t think what was going to happen to them and I really should not have been that cold-hearted.”

Leave a Comment

All posts are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.

Log in to submit comment or Create New Account below

*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
*Zip Code:
By submitting this form you agree with our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Please check this box to confirm:
 
Let em all fry
Aug 8, 2008 9:49 AM
If we could use our death penalty like we should in a quick and efficient manner, we wouldnt have to listen to this woman's line of malarky. The family wouldnt have to go thru this again either. "Oh oh we killed her but we didnt rape her!!!" So what???
Daily Reader
Aug 8, 2008 11:15 AM
Hmmmm, the only two who didn't cut deals and did not plead guilty (Winslow plead no contest) are the ones with the most severe sentences. Miss Taylor also said that she had lied before the DNA tests even came back and proved that was indeed so. She has just a year left and is now risking perjury charges - coersion sure looks like a possiblity!

Still, it's hard to believe these people are all innocent. It's a shame there was such a rush to convict that evidently the real story isn't known.

The public wants speedy aprehensions and convictions but our law enforcement has a duty to not be swayed by that and to take the time necessary to get the real facts. I especially can't see how plea bargaining for testimony should be used on such a regular basis as it is now - it's just too easy of a mechanism to abuse.
I AGREE Let em all fry
Aug 8, 2008 7:40 PM
I'm not buying anything Taylor is saying.

They are all guilty and should have had the same punishment. I thought so at the time of Helen's murder and I still think they all should have fried. Before any responses from those of you who think these people have rights-- have any of you ever lost a loved one this way? I know the Wilson family and I knew Helen. They are wonderful people and they don't deserve to go through this again. Leave it alone people!!
hate ignorance
Aug 8, 2008 10:44 PM
I truly cannot believe that people do not care that 19 years of these mens lives have been spent paying for something they did not do, and still it's not enough. I to feel bad for Helen's family but I would think they would want the people that really did this caught, and punished, not just anybody that the DA at that time put in jail, in order to close a case and get re-elected.
obvioulsy
Aug 8, 2008 11:48 PM
she was there she lied whats the penalty for perjery and assisting a crime
sh
Aug 9, 2008 10:54 AM
if she held the pillow over her face does that make HER the murderer, I would think it would unless I have the law confused in my mind
terrance N
Aug 9, 2008 7:04 PM
let them go...shame on he police .....again.......I'm sure they were x Fremont justice system workers the first time.
Forensic factchecker
Aug 10, 2008 9:41 AM
So, there three people with deals from County Attorney Smith who ALL say that ONLY White and Winslow raped Mrs. Wilson. The forensic evidence says that the semen found at the crime scene and from the autopsy does NOT match White and Winslow. My question to "let em all fry," do you think that White and Winslow used someone else's penis? There is SOMEONE out there who raped Mrs. Wilson and not in prison. Don't you care???
Hello
Aug 11, 2008 8:49 AM
I wonder how much if any communication has taken place between Taylor, Winslow, etc...

Once again the DNA may say they did not rape, but they all plead guilty to MURDER.

Plea bargains should not be allowed on any felony, especially murder of any degree. Felonies are generally not accidents and there should not be any forgiveness.

The family suffered once, has had to deal with parole hearings and now this junk.
to hello
Aug 11, 2008 9:18 AM
Have you not been reading, or is it an understanding problem! They did not all pead guilty to murder, And I'm sure Mrs. Wison's family want the real person behind bars, I would if this was my family member.
Reader
Aug 11, 2008 12:08 PM
This "lady" (and I use the word "lady" quite loosely!) claims she was coerced into lying and admitting everyone's guilt!!??!!?? Come on, why is she all of a sudden changing her story?? Why would someone admit to the crime if they were not guilty. This "lady" needs to be confined behind bars for eternity for suffocating Mrs. Wilson!!! Under the influence of drugs or not, they are all killers!!!
Why indeed
Aug 11, 2008 5:00 PM
Yes, she's claiming she was coerced by investigators and a County Attorney who were in a rush to quiet public out cry. It's happened many times before and it'll happen many times in the future.

Why is she changing her story? Good question! Remember her sentence is almost over so she's really got nothing to gain and could actually lose if they press perjury charges against her so she has more to gain by being quiet. Maybe she's tired of living with the idea of how her lies to save her own skin put others in jail for crimes they did not commit? Maybe a desire for the truth to come out? Maybe to expose the shady techniques our law enforcement and prosecurots use to satisfy the public and close cases?

Why would someone admit to a crime they didn't do? Do some research, it happens all the time.

I agree all those involved are equally guilty and should be equally punished, but it seems we don't know exactly who was involved so it does bear looking into - especially if there's a murderer still walking our streets (which there may be - who matches the unkonwn DNA and fingerprint???)
just because...
Aug 12, 2008 5:58 AM
Remember this DNA that was tested was from sperm so either or both of these guys could have raped her and left no sperm behind - any teenager has figured out how to do that. But yes it does imply that someone else also raped her or she had consensual intercourse prior with someone at some point fairly shortly before the murder.
MiMi
Aug 14, 2008 1:04 PM
None of this is logical. She said there were 5 others in that apartment.
Why did she pick out these two and not the others. She admitted she murdered
the woman. Now she wants to "tell the truth".
They were all on drugs so the only person who really knows the truth can't talk.
Julie
Aug 14, 2008 9:19 PM
Another fine example of a job done well by Smith when he was in office!

And you people complain about Ritnour?
Lets remember what we had when Smith was in office and at least be thankful that the "good ole boy" is gone.

How many other prosecutions did Smith get this way?
It doesnt add up thats the problem
Aug 15, 2008 6:48 AM
Mimi - did you notice that the two she picked out where the only two that hadn't cut deals with the County Attorney?

Mr. Winslow tried to use information on this to plea bargain out of another jam he was in, why would he do that if he were the guilty party, wouldn't it make more sense to be quiet?

This lady is almost done with her sentence and recanting now could open her up to more time if they persue perjury charges, so again - wouldn't it make more sense to just be quiet?

None of it is adding up....
Hmmm
Oct 4, 2008 9:09 AM
Is this real or am I just dreamimg? Keep this lady in prison, see when she'll change her story again.
Story Photo
Ada JoAnn Taylor
Text Size:
Text Size Increase Text Size Decrease
Print Story Email Story

Calendar of Events

December 2008
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
Today's Events