Fluoride in water to be put to vote

By Joelyn Hansen/
Daily Sun staff writer
Tuesday, Aug 05, 2008 - 10:58:13 am CDT

The decision on fluoridation is in the voters’ hands.

The Beatrice City Council voted 7-0 Monday evening to authorize a resolution to allow Beatrice residents to either reject or adopt an ordinance to prohibit the addition of fluoride to the city water system. The issue will be on the Nov. 4 ballot.

In April, the Nebraska Legislature passed LB245, which requires fluoride to be added to drinking water in cities and towns with more than 1,000 residents by June 1, 2010.  

Under the state law, cities and towns would be able to opt out of the requirement if residents vote it down or if there is there is enough naturally occurring fluoride already in the water supply.

Most of Nebraska’ population — more than 942,000 people — is served by 65 public water systems that add fluoride to water. Forty-one systems are naturally fluoridated.

But 64 Nebraska communities with more than 1,000 people, including Beatrice,     don’t add fluoride or have enough on their own. Beatrice water’s natural fluoridation level is .25.

If the city does add fluoride, residential water customers would see an increase of about 25 cents on their monthly bill, Water Superintendent Steve Kelley said. Commercial customers would see about a $1.50 increase each month.

Beatrice Public Water would likely have to spend about $88,000 to buy and install equipment and put up a building to fluoridate, Kelley said. After that, he said, he would cost about $15,000 a year to fluoridate.

City Councilman Ted Fairbanks asked how much responsibility the council would have for disseminating information to the public on the matter.

Beatrice Mayor Dennis Schuster said the council should provide factual information about LB245 and the cost to fluoridate.

The public should also ask questions and do its own research, he said.

As a city, Schuster said, it would be unfair to advocate one side over another.

“I would be very uncomfortable advocating one position or another,” he said. “There are two positions. The best that we can do is provide what factual information we have.”

Councilman Alan Fetty agreed.

“It’s also important that we let the people make the decision,” he said.

Beatrice fluoridated its water from April 17, 1950, to Nov. 23, 1954, as recommended by the Gage County Dental Association. Fluoridation stopped in 1954 after a petition was circulated in the community and the issue was placed on the ballot, Kelley said. Voters chose 2 to 1 to stop fluoridation. The issue was on the ballot two or three other times as well.

Other business before the council on Monday included the following.

Chautauqua Park playground equipment: Approved a request to move $18,000 from the capital improvement budget line for park road repairs to be used for the purchase of playground equipment at Chautauqua Park. The $20,000 remaining in park road repair money will be used to fix roads next fiscal year.

Union negotiations: Approved receipt of notice to begin contract negotiations with the Nebraska Association of Public Employees, Firefighter Local 1098 and the Fraternal Order of Police Lodge #45A.

City property agreement: Approved to postpone until Aug. 18 discussion on the license agreement with Ron and Vicki Hasley for ingress/egress rights on city property

Scott Street: Approved Scott Street drainage ditch repairs, from Center to Helen streets, in the amount of $39,025, to D.L. Lottman Excavating as recommended by the Board of Public Works.

Handicap parking: Approved the resolution for installation of a handicap parking stall and a loading/unloading stall on the north side of Court Street, between Fifth and Sixth streets.

Accessory structures: Approved the amendment to sections pertaining to the zoning ordinance of the City of Beatrice regarding attached and detached accessory structures and setbacks. An accessory structure is defined as incidental to and customarily associated with a specific principal use or primary use residence or building on the same site and lot, either attached or detached. Any detached accessory building shall not exceed a maximum of 18 feet in height, measured to the ridge of the roof, unless a special use permit to allow maximum height of 22 feet to the ridge of the roof is approved by the Beatrice Planning and Zoning Board. Accessory buildings in residential district, including private community garages, may be a minimum of five feet from the side or rear lot line if set back 60 feet or more from the front lot line. Any such accessory building must meet current adopted building code design requirements for separation to other structures on the same lot.

Leave a Comment

All posts are subject to our Terms and Standards.
Your posted comment will appear after it has been approved.

Log in to submit comment or Create New Account below

*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
*Zip Code:
By submitting this form you agree with our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Please check this box to confirm:
 
To Fluroide or not to...
Aug 5, 2008 8:04 PM
Fluride! That is the question! Tis nobler to suffer the slings and arrows of excessive taxation, or to not!
Jason
Aug 6, 2008 8:30 AM
Allright, who is going to be the first person to say that fluoridation is a government plot to kill us all and that every disease known to man is linked to fluoridated water? Vote it in, Vote it out! Just cut out the conspiracy hogwash!
Daily Reader
Aug 7, 2008 12:07 PM
It's not a conspiracy, it's just a bad idea. The drinking water system should not be used as a way to deliver medication to the entire population whether they want it or not. It should deliver clean, safe drinking water and that's it.
obvious
Aug 7, 2008 8:55 PM
It should be obvious to daily reader that there is a difference between an opinion on water fluoridation and a lunatic fringe comment about fluoride causing 9/11.
what about air
Aug 7, 2008 8:59 PM
should beatrice not spray for mosquitos? that mist ends up in 'solution' in our atmosphere that we all breath and have no choice. OR is it allowable because it's in a safe dose? Hmmmmmm........
Court Street Curmudgeon
Aug 8, 2008 7:20 AM
Consider how much tap water you actually drink. The average person needs about 8-10 glasses of water each day, but the fact is most of that requirement is met through consumption of soft drinks, bottled water, etc. However, for the sake of argument, lets assume that none of those alternative beverages existed and Beatrice residents quenched their thirst ONLY with tap water. If that were the case the entire town would drink about 7,000 or 8,000 gallons per day, which represents less than 1/2 of 1% of the 2.1 million gallons of water the city uses on an average day. Does it make sense to fluoridate 2.1 million gallons when only a tiny portion, (which is probably closer to 2,000 gals), is actually consumed? Most of our water is used to flush toilets, water lawns, wash people/cars/laundry, and various industrial uses. There are dozens of fluoride toothpastes available and they stay in contact with the teeth much longer than a swig of water does.
Steve
Aug 8, 2008 10:13 AM
http://www.healthymineralwater.com/id5.html

The main reason people want floride in our water is "to prevent tooth decay" I find this very sad when there is NO provable evidence in any research that it does. There is however TONS of evidence that is causes cancer, birth-defects, down-syndrome. Its nice to see our government wants to take such good care of us.
Reader
Aug 8, 2008 12:10 PM
We never have a choice and you all know it. They may call it a vote, but they do what they want to do, so why waste our time?
How many are going to be like my family and buy bottled water?
Daily Reader
Aug 8, 2008 8:19 PM
Don't blame the Board of Public Works, this is coming from the state. I'm sure it makes no real difference to the water dept, they'll do whatever the voters want.

Bottled water? Most of it comes from city water systems! AND it does NOT meet the same standards as a water system does! It does initially, obviously since it comes from a city system, but after it's packaged it only has to meet food safety standards and they are actually lower than city water system standards so as the stuff sits around waiting to be bought and consumed all kinds of stuff can be growing in it as well as it leaching out potentially harmful chemicals from the plastic bottle they normally come in.

Buying water just doesn't make sense - just as good a stuff comes out of your facet, save your money and fill up your own bottles! If you don't like the chlorine get a filter or just run a pitcher full and let it set over night in the fridge and the chlorine will off gas.

Again, fluoride is a medicine and it's not appropriate to force medicate an entire population - the water system should deliver water and that's it! (no, I don't really agree with chlorination either - who knows what consuming chlorine year after year will do and anyone ever know anyone who got sick drinking Beatrice's water prior to the chlorination?)
to steve
Aug 9, 2008 12:44 AM
contact the dental college to get more info backing fluoride than you could read in a week. Don't know why people keep saying there's no evidence for benefits of fluoride? Now, this doesn't mean that you must put it in your water, but for pete's sake!
Yes what about air
Aug 11, 2008 11:57 AM
I'm not really in favor of spraying for mosquitos either! They are a pest, but spreading chemicals all over the city may not be such a great idea either.

It seems we all live with the better living through chemistry mindset but it seems we usually end up just hurting ourselves and nature eventually over rules us anyway (bugs, germs, weeds, etc. become immune to the chemicals).

I just shake my head head when I hear people admire nice green lawns and complain about those who don't have them. Most of the nice green lawns are that way because of all the chemicals they pour on it and those chemicals are traveling down through the soil to the water table and our kids and grandkids are going to have to deal with them! We're in a water shortage, but it's evidently important to take good clean drinking water and pour it out on the ground for a nice green lawn! Again, who cares? Let our kids and grandkids worry about a depleted aquafer!

It's time to get back to nature folks! Stop putting stuff in our water, we just need good clean water. Stop dumping chemicals all over the place. Stop spraying chemicals all over, etc.. Let's try to work with nature to make our little corner of the world better - if we fight nature we'll just lose!
ks
Aug 12, 2008 10:46 AM
About 15 years ago, I went on a field trip with my daughter's class to the Dental College in Lincoln. The person in charge told us they were always excited to have Beatrice children come visit and have free exams because their students never saw tooth decay in the Lincoln children that came to visit. They saw plenty of it in the Beatrice children because they didn't have fluoride in the water.
Text Size:
Text Size Increase Text Size Decrease
Print Story Email Story

Calendar of Events

December 2008
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
Today's Events